TheReference

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Reagan's Star Wars: 30 years ago

Posted on 12:45 AM by Unknown
Ronald Reagan gave the following 30-minute talk on March 23rd, 1983, i.e. 30 years ago:



Most of the talk is about the motivation and the situation. The very SDI comments begin at 25:00 or so.

The visionary SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) speech was arguably the most consequential presidential speech in the modern U.S. history. I am somewhat impressed by the depth of the technical arguments that Reagan offered.

In July 1979, Reagan would visit some defense folks in Colorado and they showed him that the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine was the only possible conclusion. Ronald Reagan couldn't accept such an attitude and the speech above symbolized what he wanted to do to protect the civilians against the Soviet-led attacks from outer space and change the doctrine.




I was 10 years old, I spoke no English, and today was actually the first time I listened to the speech above. But I remember that during a gym class, when I was a 3rd grader or a 4th grader, at the 21st Elementary School in Pilsen with an extended education of languages (Russian, in my case then), we suddenly had to listen to a bizarre scary speech in the school radio sometimes in 1983 or 1984 or so.

We were told that the international situation got worsened a lot and a war could be imminent. Of course, we were told about the imperialist warmongers all the time but this was the only time when I heard an announcement fully dedicated to a possibly looming war.




I have never reconstructed the date of that bizarre announcement or the reason behind it. Now, it seems plausible that Reagan's speech was what sparked the school radio announcement. Some commies at our school could have gotten anxious that the American imperialists could get really strong now and it's necessary to upgrade the war preparations and war rhetoric (although we've never heard anything that would be so pro-war as the North Korean propaganda we observe these days: the official propaganda would always paint us as the "camp of peace" while the capitalist world were the "warmongers").

At any rate, this was the impact of Reagan's speech on the Soviet politicians. Arms races escalated and they effectively led to the surrender of the Soviet Union. It has overspent the money for arms races. This caused some problems in the economy and that helped Gorbachev to be elected and ultimately terminate the totalitarian Cold War era in the Soviet Union – and, indirectly, in the whole Soviet bloc.

Many people – especially left-wingers – have been trying to humiliate the SDI. In 1987, the American Physical Society joined these critics and questioned whether the SDI is allowed by the laws of physics. But it's clear that "something like that" may be immensely useful and nowadays, similar technologies belong to the responsible defense strategists' standard toolkit. The critics usually employ excessively high standards when they evaluate the SDI. They say that because the technology can't be perfectly reliable under all circumstances, it's useless. But nothing in the real world is perfectly reliable but we are still using many things and they are useful.

Also, the critics who said that Reagan would effectively revive an "offensive mode" of the arms races have ultimately been proved wrong. SDI is clearly a defense technology and while it temporarily led the Soviets to be even more offensive in their strategic planning, this had to collapse and this did collapse, leading the world to the end of the Cold War. I would summarize the U.S. critics' motivation by saying that the real reason why most of them were annoyed was that they wanted the Soviet Union to prevail and Reagan's plan made that outcome less likely. They were commies. In fact, Obama's administration is the first Democratic administration after Reagan that accepted that SDI is a good idea. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel proposed to increase the GBIs on Friday.

Before the SDI plans managed to undermine the Soviet empire, the CIA has played an effective misinformation game. The Soviets have spent lots of money on similar anti-rockets, too. X-rays were planned to be the defensive bullets. Most of these devices remained on paper but the implications of these papers were damn tangible and damn far-reaching.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in missile, politics, science and society | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ostragene: realtime evolution in a dirty city
    Ostrava , an industrial hub in the Northeast of the Czech Republic, is the country's third largest city (300,000). It's full of coal...
  • Origin of the name Motl
    When I was a baby, my father would often say that we come a French aristocratic dynasty de Motl – for some time, I tended to buy it ;-). Muc...
  • Likely: latest Atlantic hurricane-free date at least since 1941
    Originally posted on September 4th. Now, 5 days later, it seems that no currently active systems will grow to a hurricane so the records wi...
  • Papers on the ER-EPR correspondence
    This new, standardized, elegant enough name of the Maldacena-Susskind proposal that I used in the title already exceeds the price of this b...
  • Bernhard Riemann: an anniversary
    Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann was born in a village in the Kingdom of Hanover on September 17th, 1826 and died in Selasca (Verbania), No...
  • New iPhone likely to have a fingerprint scanner
    One year ago, Apple bought AuthenTec , a Prague-based security company ( 7 Husinecká Street ), for $356 million. One may now check the Czech...
  • Prediction isn't the right method to learn about the past
    Happy New Year 2013 = 33 * 61! The last day of the year is a natural moment for a blog entry about time. At various moments, I wanted to wri...
  • Lubošification of Scott Aaronson is underway
    In 2006, quantum computing guy Scott Aaronson declared that he was ready to write and defend any piece of nonsensical claim about quantum gr...
  • A slower speed of light: MIT relativistic action game
    In the past, this blog focused on relativistic optical effects and visualizations of Einstein's theory: special relativity (download Re...
  • Eric Weinstein's invisible theory of nothing
    On Friday, I received an irritated message from Mel B. who had read articles in the Guardian claiming that Eric Weinstein found a theory of ...

Categories

  • alternative physics (7)
  • astronomy (49)
  • biology (19)
  • cars (2)
  • climate (93)
  • colloquium (1)
  • computers (18)
  • Czechoslovakia (57)
  • Denmark (1)
  • education (7)
  • Europe (33)
  • everyday life (16)
  • experiments (83)
  • France (5)
  • freedom vs PC (11)
  • fusion (3)
  • games (2)
  • geology (5)
  • guest (6)
  • heliophysics (2)
  • IQ (1)
  • Kyoto (5)
  • landscape (9)
  • LHC (40)
  • markets (40)
  • mathematics (37)
  • Middle East (12)
  • missile (9)
  • murders (4)
  • music (3)
  • philosophy of science (73)
  • politics (98)
  • religion (10)
  • Russia (5)
  • science and society (217)
  • sports (5)
  • string vacua and phenomenology (114)
  • stringy quantum gravity (90)
  • TBBT (5)
  • textbooks (2)
  • TV (8)
  • video (22)
  • weather records (30)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (341)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (42)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (38)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ▼  March (44)
      • Tom Banks: holographic axioms against firewalls
      • 01 result from AMS-02 on 03/04 at 05 pm
      • Antiprotons obey CPT within 5 ppm
      • Reunification of Korea
      • Irrational dissatisfactions with physics
      • Waiting for peak oil: a paradox
      • Americans see the Higgs boson, too
      • Rosatom plans fast reactors based on U-238
      • Speed of light is variable: only in junk media
      • Reagan's Star Wars: 30 years ago
      • Wernher von Braun: 101st birthday
      • Exploding glass: slowed down
      • Margaret Thatcher as the first climate alarmist
      • Cyprus bailout savings tax is better than alternat...
      • Sasha Polyakov joins the Milner Prize winners
      • Pierre Deligne wins Abel Prize
      • Greene et al.: too large landscapes are unstable
      • Equinox, astronomical spring: now
      • Matt Ridley on the greening planet
      • Michio Kaku's confusing Higgs remarks
      • Tyson vs Greene: a lesson in demagogy
      • Christian Doppler: an anniversary
      • Georg Ohm: birthday
      • Paul Krugman, climate, and inconceivable sins
      • God particle's humility on display
      • Pentagon transitions: tools to solve planar \(\NNN...
      • Climategate 2013 is here: FOIA
      • Gustav Kirchhoff: a birthday
      • There are 921,497 CICY four-folds
      • Greening the world's deserts with lots of cows
      • 13 new periodic solutions to the 3-body problem
      • Walter Kohn: 90th birthday
      • Science cannot answer moral questions II
      • ATLAS: 3-sigma excess of \(420\GeV\) type III sees...
      • Reasons to be grateful to Václav Klaus
      • Black hole monodromies explain why inner horizons ...
      • Crisis forgotten: Dow Jones sets a new all-time high
      • Alessandro Volta: an anniversary
      • George Gamow: 109th birthday
      • LHCb: \(7\)-\(\sigma\) and \(9\)-\(\sigma\) anomal...
      • We don't live in a simulation
      • AGW petition by Ranga Myneni: 1 billion signatures...
      • Bubbles support \(10\GeV\) or \(50\GeV\) dark matter
      • Is the Higgs boson just Higgs-like?
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2012 (159)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (50)
    • ►  October (53)
    • ►  September (19)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile