TheReference

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Czech taxpayers will pay a trillion for the solar mistake

Posted on 11:14 PM by Unknown
...trillion of crowns, of course...

Because the dear reader probably doesn't know how much the Czech koruna, the peso of ours, is worth, I must tell you that 1 U.S. dollar is about 19 crowns. Still, a trillion is a large number.



Czech media published the disturbing calculation by the environment ministry yesterday. The total amount of money that the Czech taxpayers have already paid or will have to pay for the past solar subsidies and the unavoidable pledged solar subsidies in the future will probably reach a trillion of crowns or $50 billion.
News: Pope Benedict XVI is resigning as the boss of the Catholic Church. You are surely asking what is the actual reason. Wolfgang has a possible explanation. ;-)
That's quite a lot for the not-to-large Czech economy – which became Europe's #3 solar superpower in the absolute sense (not just on per-capita basis!). Multiply the number by 60 (the U.S/Czech GDP ratio) or so to see what it would do with the U.S. economy if it were equally generous: the solar subsidies in the U.S. would surpass 3 trillion dollars! No wonder, the Czech Republic has 35.5 times more solar per capita than the Sunshine State, Florida.




During a debate on TV Prima yesterday, the current center-right environment minister Mr Tomáš Chalupa said that the "green ideology and the religion of renewable energy sources have played a role in the expansion of this inefficient system. A bad bill was the culprit," the minister said while he boasted that none of the center-right ODS lawmakers (his party) voted in support of the bill back in 2005. He thinks that "a good idea was brutally abused."

However, the true boom of the subsidized energy prices took off in 2010; Chalupa blames it on the mistakes of the 2009-2010 technocratic government led by Mr Jan Fischer (an unsuccessful presidential candidate a month ago). The government pledged to buy up 1 kWh of solar energy per CZK 12.15, about $0.65 according to the current exchange rate. The end consumer pays around CZK 5-6 per kWh so the solar producers were getting at least twice as much than the overall amount of money collected for the energy as well as all other expenses.

(The solar/coal as well solar/nuclear energy price ratios are of course much higher than two.)

The solar boom instantly cooled down at the beginning of 2011 when the guaranteed prices dropped to CZK 5.5 per kWh, about the same rate that the final consumer pays for the energy. Big investors were abandoning their plans rather quickly. However, small investors continue to participate in this giant fad. In 2012, the Energy Regulation Office was evaluating over 10,000 applications to approve solar power plants although most of them were just on roofs of privately owned houses.

The current minister promised a big investigation why all these things have occurred to make it less likely that something similar would be repeated in the future. The Czech politicians, including the center-right prime minister, plasma physicist Mr Petr Nečas and parties as diverse as the (unreformed) Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia seem to agree that the generous subsidies have been a giant blunder. A question is, of course, whether pro-renewable religious bigots and lunatics in the EU won't force us to think otherwise.

It's not hard to understand that CZK 1 trillion is a lot of money. A number to compare: we're still net recipients of the EU money. Most of the EU money that should flow to the Czech Republic in 2014-2010 according to the recently approved budget is the "cohesion fund to support the regions" and it's slightly above CZK 500 billion. That's also a lot of money but the money wasted for the solar subsidies over a similar timescale – subsidies that were mostly consequences of an insane fad imported from the EU – are still going to be twice as high as the whole "cohesion fund" we're getting from the EU.

This is an example of an estimate that suggests that when you add up all the costs and benefits that are de facto inseparable from the EU membership, we may actually be losing money by being EU members.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in climate, Czechoslovakia, Europe, politics | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ostragene: realtime evolution in a dirty city
    Ostrava , an industrial hub in the Northeast of the Czech Republic, is the country's third largest city (300,000). It's full of coal...
  • Origin of the name Motl
    When I was a baby, my father would often say that we come a French aristocratic dynasty de Motl – for some time, I tended to buy it ;-). Muc...
  • Likely: latest Atlantic hurricane-free date at least since 1941
    Originally posted on September 4th. Now, 5 days later, it seems that no currently active systems will grow to a hurricane so the records wi...
  • Papers on the ER-EPR correspondence
    This new, standardized, elegant enough name of the Maldacena-Susskind proposal that I used in the title already exceeds the price of this b...
  • Bernhard Riemann: an anniversary
    Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann was born in a village in the Kingdom of Hanover on September 17th, 1826 and died in Selasca (Verbania), No...
  • New iPhone likely to have a fingerprint scanner
    One year ago, Apple bought AuthenTec , a Prague-based security company ( 7 Husinecká Street ), for $356 million. One may now check the Czech...
  • Prediction isn't the right method to learn about the past
    Happy New Year 2013 = 33 * 61! The last day of the year is a natural moment for a blog entry about time. At various moments, I wanted to wri...
  • Lubošification of Scott Aaronson is underway
    In 2006, quantum computing guy Scott Aaronson declared that he was ready to write and defend any piece of nonsensical claim about quantum gr...
  • A slower speed of light: MIT relativistic action game
    In the past, this blog focused on relativistic optical effects and visualizations of Einstein's theory: special relativity (download Re...
  • Eric Weinstein's invisible theory of nothing
    On Friday, I received an irritated message from Mel B. who had read articles in the Guardian claiming that Eric Weinstein found a theory of ...

Categories

  • alternative physics (7)
  • astronomy (49)
  • biology (19)
  • cars (2)
  • climate (93)
  • colloquium (1)
  • computers (18)
  • Czechoslovakia (57)
  • Denmark (1)
  • education (7)
  • Europe (33)
  • everyday life (16)
  • experiments (83)
  • France (5)
  • freedom vs PC (11)
  • fusion (3)
  • games (2)
  • geology (5)
  • guest (6)
  • heliophysics (2)
  • IQ (1)
  • Kyoto (5)
  • landscape (9)
  • LHC (40)
  • markets (40)
  • mathematics (37)
  • Middle East (12)
  • missile (9)
  • murders (4)
  • music (3)
  • philosophy of science (73)
  • politics (98)
  • religion (10)
  • Russia (5)
  • science and society (217)
  • sports (5)
  • string vacua and phenomenology (114)
  • stringy quantum gravity (90)
  • TBBT (5)
  • textbooks (2)
  • TV (8)
  • video (22)
  • weather records (30)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (341)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (42)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (38)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (44)
    • ▼  February (41)
      • Superconductive Leon Cooper: birthday
      • Czech president's alleged high treason: a childish...
      • Sir Ranulph Fiennes' frostbite highlights global w...
      • Learning physics is futile without practicing
      • Mauritia: microcontinents must have been around fo...
      • A pro-firewall paper
      • Mauna Loa carbon dioxide: a fit
      • Unstable Universes: guest blog
      • Ludwig Boltzmann: a birthday
      • The Balkans aren't ready for investments
      • Nicolaus Copernicus: 540th birthday
      • AMS-02 dark matter results in 2-3 weeks
      • Nima at STScl: don't modify gravity, understand it
      • Branes as a generalization of charged particles
      • Nick Cave: Higgs Boson Blues
      • Ernest Moniz, MIT: Chu's successor?
      • Al Gore, president of Earth Inc, didn't mention cl...
      • Should we build a defense system against meteorites?
      • Galileo Galilei: an anniversary
      • SSC Naples - Viktoria Pilsen
      • Engineers, geoscientists: only 36% believe in CAGW
      • Klaus on abdication of Benedict XVI
      • Goddard, Watts vs Tamino: Arctic ice
      • Susskind, Hrabovsky: The Theoretical Minimum
      • Scientific genius isn't extinct
      • A proof of Intelligent Design?
      • Czech taxpayers will pay a trillion for the solar ...
      • James Weatherall: Physics of Wall Street
      • Are tensor products in QM unnatural?
      • UV/IR connection: link between God and His inverse
      • Nature, Reuters: Amazon forest will thrive due to CO2
      • Fermiophobic, four-generation Higgs ruled out
      • Snowstorm: comparison with the 2005 blizzard
      • Steve Hsu: Alice is Schrödinger's cat who may have...
      • Lubošification of Scott Aaronson is underway
      • Skeptical Swedish climatology
      • Hendrik Antoon Lorentz: an anniversary
      • High energy physics jobs: terror against formal th...
      • Longest match in Davis Cup
      • Steven Chu quits, misunderstands the end of Stone Age
      • France bans light at night
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2012 (159)
    • ►  December (37)
    • ►  November (50)
    • ►  October (53)
    • ►  September (19)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile